betalogue.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the betalogue.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host betalogue.com. Currently, hosted in France and its service provider is OVH SAS .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

 notes from an unfinished world… new three-monitor (4k + 5k + 4k) setup for my 2014 mac pro posted by pierre igot in: macintosh may 26th, 2017 • 5:42 pm like many other professional mac users, i suspect, i was quite relieved when apple finally shared, in early april, with a select panel of writers who cover apple news, their plans for the mac pro and, more generally speaking, for pro and “prosumer” users of macintosh computers. when the new mac pro was announced in 2013, i was still using a workstation consisting of a 2009 mac pro with 12 gb of ram, two superdrives (one for region 1 and one for region 2), and two geforce gt 120 video cards driving two 30″ apple cinema displays (each with a native resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels). i had, in previous years, changed my startup drive from the conventional 1 tb hard drive that came with the mac pro to a 240gb mercury extreme pro 6g ssd from other world computing , and i had three conventional hard drives in the other three internal bays, as well as some external firewire hard drives for backup. i was reasonably happy with the 2009 mac pro, but of course, by that time it was getting a bit long in the tooth and i started lusting after the new mac pro. what i found particularly attractive was its promise of near-silent operation. while the 2009 mac pro was not outrageously noisy, it still was far from silent. now, i knew, of course, that, with no internal bays for hard drives, even if i got a large internal ssd for the 2013 mac pro, i would still need external drives, and those could be quite noisy. but i also knew that thunderbolt offered the possibility of a very long cable connection between the drives and the computer, which meant that i had the option to relegate the hard drives to a more remote location. because of past experience with problematic devices (the original titanium powerbook g4 with its very poor airport reception, and the disastrous mooing macbook ), there was no way that i was going to be an early adopter of the 2013 mac pro, so i waited until well into 2014 before purchasing one. in july 2014, i bought a new mac pro with 32 gb of ram, a 1-tb ssd internal drive, along with a 32″ 4k sharp pn-k321 display (3,840 x 2,160 pixels), a minidisplayport-to-dvi adapter for one of my 30″ apple cinema displays, and an external promise pegasus2 r4 thunderbolt 2 unit with four 2 gb conventional hard drives, with a 30-foot thunderbolt 2 cable to connect the pegasus2 r4 to the mac pro. (it was an expensive order.) when we moved to our new house in december 2014, i was able to move the pegasus2 r4 to the basement, which meant that i now only had the mac pro and the displays on my desk in my office. it was close to perfectly silent operation most of the time. (occasionally, when it gets quite warm in the room, the mac pro fan does kick in a bit, with a somewhat annoying high-pitched whine, but it’s fairly rare, and nowhere near as annoying as the constant whir of the fans in conventional hard drives.) at first, it didn’t really bother me or worry me that apple didn’t release upgraded versions of the 2013 mac pro. i was happy with my machine, and the lack of upgrades meant that i didn’t even have to worry about being tempted by a new mac. but then, of course, after a couple of years, the complete lack of upgrades caused me to start worrying, like many others, about the long-term future of the mac pro and about the future of the mac platform in general. (my dismal experiences with os x on the mac pro, especially with yosemite , did little to help dispell my concerns.) then i had another bad experience with os x, this time with el capitan and the random temporary video freezes it would cause on my mac pro. as reported earlier on this blog , the problem was initially misdiagnosed by apple as a hardware problem, which forced me to leave the mac pro at the apple store for about 10 days back in december 2016. this unfortunate situation indirectly led me to make the somewhat impulsive decision to purchase a new imac 5k. the idea was that i would use it as a replacement for the mac pro for 10 days, and then, when i got my mac pro back (presumably fixed), i would give the imac 5k to my wife to replace her own desktop machine, which was my older 2009 mac pro. (performance-wise, the older mac pro was more than enough for her, but of course, she too dreamed of a quieter machine, and the 2009 mac pro was now seven years old…) my idea was that not only it was time to get a new mac for my wife anyway, but also that i would get to test-drive the imac 5k as a workstation for my own office for 10 days. at that stage, in december 2016, there was still complete radio silence from apple about the future of the mac pro, and even about the mac more generally speaking. i figured that, if indeed they were to abandon the mac pro altogether, i might have to fall back on a beefed-up imac as an alternative, and i wanted to see if it was feasible. my conclusion after 10 days was that it was indeed feasible. it would not be ideal, because the performance level on the imac 5k with a 2 tb fusion drive was not quite on par with the 2014 mac pro, but it was not too slow, and i would always have the option to get an imac with an ssd drive instead of a fusion drive. i must admit that i was also curious to see what it would feel like to work with a retina monitor for the first time. i had first-hand experience with retina on the ipad and on the iphone, but not on a desktop computer. (i had never owned a retina laptop either.) my view had always been that it was more important for me to have lots of screen real estate than to have a very high resolution. i was able to set up the imac 5k with my 4k sharp pn-k321 monitor as a secondary display, and thus get a display setup that was somewhat similar to what i was used to on the mac pro (with the sharp pn-k321 display as my main display and a 30″ apple cinema display as a secondary display) — except with a better-quality picture all around. then i got my mac pro back (with a replacement video card that did nothing to fix the random video freezes — which turned out to be fixed by upgrading to sierra later in december), i had to give up the imac 5k. i didn’t really miss it, except… that i had been bitten by the retina bug. there was just no denying that things looked much better in macos with retina, and so i started experimenting with my existing setup on the mac pro and exploring my options. the first that i did was that i tried using the sharp pn-k321 display in “scaled” resolution, i.e. in retina mode. that meant sacrificing quite a bit of screen real estate, because i was now down to an effective resolution of 1,920 x 1,080 pixels (as opposed to the native 3,840 x 2,160 pixels), but i also had to admit that, even with the native 3,840 x 2,160 resolution, i was only able to have two document windows open side by side, with a high zoom setting (around 200%, to make the text readable at a comfortable level). now i could still have two documents side by side, with a more normal zoom setting (a little over 100%), but the text looked undeniably better. the one major drawback in this approach was that, since the sharp pn-k321 monitor was my primary display, the whole macos user interface was now much bigger and taking more space. i could use some settings in macos itself or in third-party tools for tinkering with hidden macos settings to try and minimize the impact of the switch, but there were still things that i could do nothing about. the menubar itself, for example, was now pretty big, with much less room for menu extras on the right. (i was already a bartender user, but i had to move more items to the secondary bar.) also, all the controls in individual applications were bigger. for certain things, it was not too much of a problem. dialog boxes might have been larger, for example, but they didn’t have to stay open all the time. for other things, which had to stay open and visible all the tim

URL analysis for betalogue.com

http://www.betalogue.com/2004/12/
http://www.betalogue.com/2005/03/
http://www.betalogue.com/2014/12/
http://www.betalogue.com/2009/09/
http://www.betalogue.com/2005/08/
http://www.betalogue.com/2013/05/
http://www.betalogue.com/2004/04/
http://www.betalogue.com
http://www.betalogue.com/2003/11/
http://www.betalogue.com/2015/03/06/yosemite-preview-fast-resizing/#comments
http://www.betalogue.com/2011/07/
http://www.betalogue.com/2017/05/04/macos-failure-to-buffer-user-actions/
http://www.betalogue.com/2012/02/
http://www.betalogue.com/2010/07/
http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/04/macbook-the-mooing-noise-disaster/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: BETALOGUE.COM
Registry Domain ID: 106171946_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucowsdomains.com
Updated Date: 2017-07-02T12:15:38Z
Creation Date: 2003-11-05T22:16:59Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-11-05T22:16:59Z
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: DNS.OVH.NET
Name Server: NS.OVH.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-08-11T21:31:55Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Tucows Domains Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =betalogue.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME betalogue.com

  CHANGED 2017-07-02

  CREATED 2003-11-05

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  DNS.OVH.NET 213.186.33.102

  NS.OVH.NET 213.251.128.136

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .